[CQ-Contest] Re; Skimmer Ultimate Setup
Joe Subich, W4TV
w4tv at subich.com
Fri Mar 21 13:22:37 EDT 2008
> To say there is a difference between an packet connection
> feeding information that was generated by another operator
> OR another operator's Skimmer setup and "owning your own"
> wide-band receiver which feeds the same information to your
> software is really splitting hairs.
There is absolutely a clear, bright, absolute difference between
information (not "spots") that comes from one's own station and
information generated by other operators whether it be from
packet, talent or the next room. Far from splitting a hair, the
difference is as fundamental as north vs. south or east vs. west.
There is no "hair splitting" at all - assistance means assistance
from another human operator. It does not count automation in any
form whether that be a memory keyer/DVK, computer logging or even
the "station owner" fixing antennas or amplifiers so the operator
can keep his butt in the chair.
CW Skimmer is in the category of memory keyer/DVK, computer
logging/duping or mechanical pencils. That ship sailed 40
years ago.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Stan Stockton
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2008 10:21 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Re; Skimmer Ultimate Setup
>
>
> Let's see if I have this right..... Many people are making
> the assumption that Skimmer is just another tool for the
> Single Operator UNASSISTED Category entrant?
>
> I have hope there are enough who can see beyond today who
> believe this
> is a tool for the Single Operator ASSISTED category. To say
> there is a
> difference between an packet connection feeding information that was
> generated by another operator OR another operator's Skimmer
> setup and "owning your own" wide-band receiver which feeds
> the same information to your software is really splitting hairs.
>
> In my opinion, If you are unassisted, you do not have any
> THING or any ONE telling you the callsign and frequency of a
> station that you can work to
> improve your score.
>
> The ultimate set up, if it is allowed, is write software to
> have your rig QSY to the most appropriate spot (based on
> where your yagi is pointed, which
> spot will most likely improve your score the most and have
> the rig make the
> contact and log it for you and then go to the next one.
> Same set up on the run frequency. The more rigs you have the
> better your score will be. I can see it now "Oh, cool!. I
> worked VU2PTT the first night on 20M and the computer moved
> him to 40M where I also worked him. Never heard him, but saw
> him in the log.
>
> It makes me want to go find my golf clubs instead of thinking
> about radio
> 24/7.
>
> Stan, K5GO
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list