[CQ-Contest] WPX SN...has to be a better way!

David Gilbert xdavid at cis-broadband.com
Tue May 27 21:27:03 EDT 2008


I think it just adds to the confusion, especially in noisy conditions.  
Consider how many number-words start with letters that represent 
commonly used cut numbers, or are within a dit or two of being a number.

73,
Dave   AB7E


B. Scott Andersen wrote:
> I actually did that this weekend. My SN "222" was not being received  
> well by the other fellow
> so I sent "two two two". That was met with dead silence for a few  
> seconds followed by "NR?".
> I agree: that should work. But, when guys are expecting digits (and I  
> mean _really_ expecting
> digits!) the receipt of letters seems to confuse the daylights out of  
> them. Or my signal was
> just that weak...
>
> By the way, he did get the "222" eventually and it was a good QSO (and
> a Mult, I believe).
>
> -- Scott (NE1RD) 
>
> David Robbins K1TTT said:
>
> Use the technique we used to use in the navy for messages that had to be
> received perfectly, spell out the numbers. "one two three four" gives  
> you
> plenty of time to copy each digit, and even if you miss a letter or
> two you can often get it right.
>
> B. Scott Andersen           | "Magic is real, unless declared integer."
> bsandersen -atsign- mac.com | -- The collected sayings of Wiz Zumwalt
> Acton, MA (NE1RD)           | http://www.bsandersen.com
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>   


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list