[CQ-Contest] Check Year Distribution-->Section Distribution?

[Steve London]

Joe,

Check out the sidebars in the 2006 CW SS web report at 
http://www.arrl.org/members-only/contests/results/2006/ss-cw/

I believe the "Least-Worked Sections" and "Missed Sections" graphs would be of 
interest.

In 2006, the top-5 least total QSO's were:

80. NT
79. Mb
78. NL
77. PR
76. Wy

However, the top-5 that caused the most people to miss a clean sweep were:

80. NT
79. NL
78. Mb
77. Ak
76. De

73,
Steve, N2IC

Joe Hetrick wrote:
> Being a newcomer (I'm one of those check-years that start with a 0  
> *hehe*),
> 
> I thought the data compiled by W5GN was kind of neat.  I'm always on  
> the lookout for stations reporting checks close (or later) than my own  
> because I find it kind of interesting to know how many guys found CW  
> as I did and enjoy it.
> 
> I know in the SS world the NWT's are the tough ones;  Does someone  
> have a distribution of sections in logs?
> 
> What sections are statistically rare, beside those in the frozen north?
> 
> My gut tells me SD/ND?
> 
> 73,
> 
> Joe KC0VKN
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>