[CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9

[David Wilburn]

 From the east coast with wire antennas, I was impressed with working 
Alaska, Hawaii, and Japan on voice.  Must be much more common for 
other folks.  There were close to 100 J stations on the cluster 
Saturday, and I worked quite a few.  Even worked a couple on 15m.

David Wilburn
NM4M
http://www.nm4m.com




Alan Leith wrote:
> Well, Barry, you beat me because I didn't even S&P.  This is one CQWW in
> which I did not participate.  I've missed a few others in the last bunch of
> years because I was not able to operate but this year there was nothing to
> spark my interest, and I didn't even get on to give points to some of my
> buddies.  From what I heard, or didn't hear as the case may be, they
> probably could have used the points -- assuming they could have heard me.
> 
> 73
> 
> Al, VE1AL
> 
> 
> 
>  
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Barry [mailto:w2up3 at verizon.net] 
> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 6:28 PM
> To: Alan Leith
> Cc: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9
> 
> Condx were miserable.  This is the first contest I can remember where I just
> S&P'd and never called CQ.  10 was useless.  15 was almost useless
> - big guns were workable, little guns weren't there. 20 was too crowded to
> find a clear spot.  40 was 40, with too many EUs listening only below 7100.
> 80 was a mess - too many EUs operating  way down in band where NA was
> covered in EU QRM, and our antennas don't work well below 3700, anyway.  160
> was 160, especially on SSB.
> 
> I had more fun playing with Morserunner and practicing my CW typing on
> lcwo.com.
> 
> Barry W2UP
> 
> 
> Alan Leith wrote:
>> Almost every one of the stations you mentioned are big guns with lots 
>> of power and great antenna systems.  They are, in no way, indicative 
>> of band conditions.  The little pistols, like you and me, are still 
>> down in the mud and washed away by QSB.
>>
>> The only good thing is that signals other than the big guns' might 
>> come up out of the noise long enough to scrape out a QSO.
>>
>> Mind you, out here on the east coast, signals from Europe were fairly 
>> reasonable for several hours.  However, to me, several hours does not 
>> a contest make.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Al, VE1AL
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com 
>> [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of KI9A at aol.com
>> Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2008 10:54 AM
>> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Subject: [CQ-Contest] European sigs to W9
>>
>> I just made pass thru 20 meters, and made a few notes of signal
> strengths.
>> Obviously not scientific!
>>  
>> Rig ICOM 756 PRO3, AGC set slow. No preamp on, 2.4 filter Ant 
>> Cushcraft A3 tribander at 25'
>>  
>> 1330 Z  ( 8:30am local) in Belleville, IL
>>  
>> RW1AC 59+20 loudest on the band
>> ER0WW +15
>> DR1A +15
>> RK2FWA +10
>> LY5R +10
>> S56M +10 must have had bad rx freq  had at least 5 calling, did not  
>> hear any of them OK4U +10 OH5Z +10 OH4A +10 RK3DZB +5 ES5TV +5 RL3A +5 
>> IR2C +5 SO0Q 59 DR5Z 59 GI5K 59 SM6U 58 YT1BB 58 IO2L 58
>>  
>> Just an idea of what the loudest European stations sound like, in 
>> southwest
>>
>> Illinois, on 20, at the bottom of the solar cycle, with a low tribander!
>> And
>> condx today seem very good!!
>>  
>> 73- Chuck KI9A
>>  
>> **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All of your 
>> favorites, no registration required and great graphics - check it out!
>> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?red
>> ir=
>> http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> --
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - http://www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.0.175 / Virus Database: 270.8.3/1747 - Release Date: 
>> 10/26/2008 9:27 AM
>>
>>   
>