[CQ-Contest] Station Inspections
    Paul O'Kane 
    pokane at ei5di.com
       
    Sun Aug 16 05:54:34 PDT 2009
    
    
  
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "David Kopacz" <david.kopacz at aspwebhosting.com>
> It's BS. Open logs are BS.
Really?  I believe open logs are one of the most welcome changes
in recent years. 
> If you want to see my logs, ask...perhaps
> I'll let you.
Thanks, but we don't need to ask.  When you enter CQWW your
logs are on the web for everyone to see.
> Think about it...if "THEY" weren't "THEMSELVES" participants
> in the very same contest for which "THEY" intend to enforce
> "THEIR" silly catch the cheater rules, none of this would
> matter!
Looks like paranoia to me.  THEY are out to get someone :-)
> Personally, I don't think there's that much cheating going on.
Personally, I think there is that much cheating going on, and
I welcome station inspections and open logs.
> Perhaps it is more likely that there are a lot of people that
> are paranoid, delusional and can't quite figure out why they
> are getting beat, so they conclude that everyone else must be
> cheating. 
Yes, that's me.  Paranoid, delusional and a poor loser :-)
> As a "NON CHEATER", I do not advocate the use of home invasions
Ah - the power of paranoia, to make station inspections become
home invasions.
73,
Paul EI5DI
    
    
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list