[CQ-Contest] Log Analysis.
Doug Smith
dougw9wi at gmail.com
Sat Aug 22 10:08:33 PDT 2009
Steve London wrote:
> If you're questioning the ability to have such a high rate, and be able to
> intersperse some S&P QSO's.....
I think what he's getting at is that it appears the run QSOs on 14.099 and the S&P QSOs on various other frequencies may have been logged on two
different computers:
>>> QSO: 14065 CW 200-11-25 1329
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1328
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1329
>>> QSO: 14114 CW 200-11-25 1330
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1329
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1329
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1330
>>> QSO: 21034 CW 200-11-25 1329
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1330
>>> QSO: 14058 CW 200-11-25 1331
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 200-11-25 1330
>>> QSO: 14028 CW 2007-11-25 1332
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 2007-11-25 1331
>>> QSO: 14099 CW 2007-11-25 1331
Note that the time jumps backwards, coincident with a change in frequency.
I can think of at least one scenario in which this could happen which would be perfectly consistent with the rules. There are probably more.
--
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN EM66
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list