[CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines
W0MU Mike Fatchett
w0mu at w0mu.com
Tue Feb 3 16:30:29 EST 2009
I am all for publishing the date the log was received. I think it is a
There are very few places in the world where there is no internet access.
C'mon folks get those logs in.
I would support shorter log deadlines.
Those that are going to have a problem with a delaine can make a formal
request for an extension of X number of days with a REAL reason for a
delayed log. If there was a way to further scrutinize a log any late logs
should be looked at far more closely especially if they end up being a
Log massaging/manipulation needs to go.
From: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of Pete Smith
Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2009 12:36 PM
To: Tree; cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Log checking and deadlines
At 11:38 AM 2/3/2009, Tree wrote:
>I propose that the log submission date be something that gets posted
>along with the top scores. Again, sunshine is the best disinfectant.
>Also, maybe shorter log deadlines would help - although I hate to be
>punishing those who have legitimate reasons for submitting later.
Tree, I think you're being far too lenient. Silly me, I have always
expected that if I don't make the deadline I'd better have a darned good
reason why not, before asking for an exception. Why shouldn't the major
contest sponsors make it clear they are going to enforce their deadlines,
and then do so? Are the contest sponsors afraid of being sued? How could
they be, when the due dates are published.
I think that would be even better than sunshine for disinfecting this
particular septic tank.
73, Pete N4ZR
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest