[CQ-Contest] a little more fairness?
Prasad VU2PTT
vu2ptt at gmail.com
Mon Dec 6 16:51:08 PST 2010
Ward,
Appreciate your comments and this is exactly what I have been
contemplating in the run up to planning a pan-VU contest. Trying to
decide which of the big ones to select in terms of exchange. That's a
different topic and best on a separate thread.
But to stir the pot, if VE to W can get 2 points in CQWW, why not VU
to JA get the same treatment :)
No I am not asking to turn the premier contest into the Makrothen :)
73 de Prasad VU2PTT.
On 12/7/10, Ward Silver <hwardsil at gmail.com> wrote:
> One antidote to the inevitable geographic unfairnesses of HF contesting is
> to sponsor and publicize "Contests Within a Contest" (CWACs) within the
> disadvantaged community. Create any type of competition that does not
> require the participants to violate the rules of the overall contest. Then
> publish the results in a way that recognizes the efforts of the community
> and encourages them to operate. No HF contest will ever be "fair" - in
> fact, it's not even hardly possible to define what "fair" is! So play by
> the rules of the game and add your own game on top of them!
>
> For example, why not sponsor plaques or certificates for each HS (or VU)
> state? Create clubs and teams that compete against each other. Keep
> records of "most zones" or "most countries" or something. There are lots of
> ways to play in the big contests and have a great time, even if you know the
> overall Top Ten boxes are probably as remote as the Himalaya.
>
> 73, Ward N0AX
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
--
Sent from my mobile device
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list