[CQ-Contest] CW Skimmer in NAQP?
Joe
nss at mwt.net
Thu Dec 23 07:29:58 PST 2010
Other than the good effect it has on penalizing those that blindly use
it to work people and NOT do the actual copy of the call to learn who
they are working.
Let these lazy people keep working all those busted calls and keep
getting penalized.
Works for me!
Joe WB9SBD
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 12/22/2010 10:51 PM, Tom Osborne wrote:
> I used Skimmer for the first time in the RAC contest this past weekend. It
> was loaded with busted callsigns! I saw 2 and sometimes 3 wrong calls on
> the same frequency.
>
> Seems like some have mentioned about guys using CW readers spotting wrong
> calls, but I've not seen anything like all the busted calls last weekend. I
> just don't see the advantage in using something that keeps spotting the
> wrong calls. Maybe I'm missing something here. 73
> Tom W7WHY
>
>
> Steve said:
>
> Yeah, the RTTY Roundup is starting to look like a better option for that
> weekend
> (: . Many thanks to NAQP Manager, WA7BNM.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
> On 12/22/2010 02:52 PM, RT Clay wrote:
>> The January NAQP is coming up soon. I notice that skimmer use (within
>> one's
>> own station) is now allowed for single ops. I don't remember that in the
>> rules before...I am surprised there have been no comments about it so far.
>>
>> Tor N4OGW/5
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list