[CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....
Richard F DiDonna NN3W
richnn3w at verizon.net
Fri Dec 24 10:38:01 PST 2010
Good choice. While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a
multiplier? ARRL DX, ARRL 10, CQ 160, and others all do it. Plus, its not
as if there is no activity from DC. Indeed, there were either 7 or 8
stations on from DC for the ARRL 10...
73 and merry Christmas...
Rich NN3W
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bruce Horn" <bhorn at hornucopia.com>
To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 12:50 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules
> Although the nature of contesting has been one of technological advances
> over the years that have increased scoring opportunities, it's evident
> from the postings on this list that the contesting community is not ready
> to adopt CW Skimmer-like technologies in the single-op category at this
> time. For this reason and the fact that the CW NAQP contest will be used
> as part of the team selection criteria for WRTC 2014 starting in 2011,
> we've returned the single-op criteria to the pre-2009 definition that
> prohibits the use of automated tools. The rules on the NCJ web site have
> been updated to reflect this change.
>
> 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM (bhorn at hornucopia.com)
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list