[CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....

[Richard F DiDonna NN3W]

Good choice.  While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a 
multiplier?  ARRL DX, ARRL 10, CQ 160, and others all do it.  Plus, its not 
as if there is no activity from DC.  Indeed, there were either 7 or 8 
stations on from DC for the ARRL 10...

73 and merry Christmas...

 Rich NN3W

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bruce Horn" <bhorn at hornucopia.com>
To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 12:50 PM
Subject: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules


> Although the nature of contesting has been one of technological advances 
> over the years that have increased scoring opportunities, it's evident 
> from the postings on this list that the contesting community is not ready 
> to adopt CW Skimmer-like technologies in the single-op category at this 
> time. For this reason and the fact that the CW NAQP contest will be used 
> as part of the team selection criteria for WRTC 2014 starting in 2011, 
> we've returned the single-op criteria to the pre-2009 definition that 
> prohibits the use of automated tools. The rules on the NCJ web site have 
> been updated to reflect this change.
>
> 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM   (bhorn at hornucopia.com)
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest