[CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules - while we're at it....

[Jack Brindle]

And make Campbell, CA a mult also. I'd really like to be on the "chased" side of things for a change...

Jack Brindle, W6FB


On Dec 24, 2010, at 10:38 AM, Richard F DiDonna NN3W wrote:

> Good choice.  While we're at it, how about adding Washington, D.C. as a 
> multiplier?  ARRL DX, ARRL 10, CQ 160, and others all do it.  Plus, its not 
> as if there is no activity from DC.  Indeed, there were either 7 or 8 
> stations on from DC for the ARRL 10...
> 
> 73 and merry Christmas...
> 
> Rich NN3W
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Bruce Horn" <bhorn at hornucopia.com>
> To: "cq-contest" <cq-contest at contesting.com>
> Sent: Friday, December 24, 2010 12:50 PM
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Revised 2011 NAQP Rules
> 
> 
>> Although the nature of contesting has been one of technological advances 
>> over the years that have increased scoring opportunities, it's evident 
>> from the postings on this list that the contesting community is not ready 
>> to adopt CW Skimmer-like technologies in the single-op category at this 
>> time. For this reason and the fact that the CW NAQP contest will be used 
>> as part of the team selection criteria for WRTC 2014 starting in 2011, 
>> we've returned the single-op criteria to the pre-2009 definition that 
>> prohibits the use of automated tools. The rules on the NCJ web site have 
>> been updated to reflect this change.
>> 
>> 73 de Bruce, WA7BNM   (bhorn at hornucopia.com)
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest