[CQ-Contest] wide-band cw decoding: the heart of the problem

[Joe]

Do you mean it tells you you have a new station or mult, on 14.032  but 
doesn't tell you it's call?

I still find that as being assisted myself. because it is still telling 
you where to go, or click to go to.  etc.  You dod not have to weed 
through the dozen others you have already worked to find this new one.

Joe WB9SBD

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com

On 12/25/2010 8:54 AM, kr2q at optimum.net wrote:
> The heart of the problem, for those that see a problem, is that this is a moving target.
>
> We learned second-hand that VE3EJ had a proposed definition which at least one other
> VE seems to like.
>
> But IMHO that does not work at all.
>
> So what about using a "skimmer-like" technology (apologies to K1TTT for using this term), that
> does NOT give you the callsign but DOES look at your log and flags ALL NEW MULTS.  Maybe
> a star or RED or something.  No callsign (you still have to copy that yourself), but a positive,
> for sure indication that YOU NEED THIS ONE.
>
> Or in SS, how about not only mults, but new QSOs..."You still need to work this guy" flag.  You
> don't get his callsign, but you do get the alert.
>
> For the purists out there (include me), if you want to regulate this, you had better think hard
> and project very far out of the "usual" box.
>
> So many shades of gray and even more opinions.
>
> Season's Greeting to all and may 2011 bring us improved band conditions (if we could keep the
> CQWW CW low band condition coupled with some real action on 10m, we'd be cookin' !!)
>
> de Doug KR2Q
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>