[CQ-Contest] Nasty Cheerleading in favor of R36F

[KI9A at aol.com]

I agree 100% with Hans. I see nothing at all "nasty". 
 
Could it be one station was just a bit louder than the others?
 
If you were to do this 100%, there would be claims of fist  recognition..
 
73- Chuck KI9A
 
 
In a message dated 7/11/2010 11:58:13 A.M. Central Daylight Time,  
kzerohb at gmail.com writes:



>
> Take a look at the Top 20 spotters analysis  at:
>  http://www.5bits.net/lu5dx/2010-wrtc-spots-analysis/
>
> Martin,  LU5DX
> www.5bits.net/lu5dx
>

Martin,

I went to your  site, and the analysis doesn't suggest "nasty" to me.

At this moment  R36F is spotted 21 times more than the next competitor (the 
range of  numbers for the "pack" right now runs from the mid 40's with a 
fairly even  distribution up to 121 spots).

I don't know who R36F is, and examining  the spotters on your "raw" list, I 
don't see any pattern different to  other random "spottees" that I perused.

So what is the  "nasty"?

73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his  radio"
--
Proud Member of:
A1 Operators -  http://www.arrl.org/a-1-op
MWA - http://www.W0AA.org
TCDXA -  http://www.tcdxa.org
CADXA - http://www.cadxa.org
LVDXA -  http://www.lvdxa.org
CWOps - http://www.cwops.org
SOC -  http://www.qsl.net/soc
TCFMC - http://tcfmc.org
--
Sea stories here  ---> http://k0hb.spaces.live.com/
Request QSL at  --->  http://www.clublog.org/logsearch/K0HB
All valid QSL requests honored with  old fashioned paper QSL!
LoTW  participant


_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest