[CQ-Contest] Omitting callign in exchange

Mike Fatchett W0MU w0mu at w0mu.com
Tue Nov 9 16:18:09 PST 2010


If it is in the rules and omitted then they should be DQed.

On 11/9/2010 9:31 AM, Georgek5kg at aol.com wrote:
> There were a few smarty-pants ops who were omitting their callsign in the
> exchange.  They were in violation of the rules, and should be  disqualified!
>   As the country song goes, they knew what they were a doin',  but what were
> they a thinkin'?
>
> For them to omit their callsign was confusing, as it broke the rhythm of
> what I, and my logging software, was expecting to copy.
>
>
> 73, George, K5KG
>
>
>
> George  Wagner, K5KG
> Sarasota, FL
>
>
> In a message dated 11/9/2010 6:12:03 A.M. Canada Central Standard Ti,
> n0nb at n0nb.us writes:
>
> Note  well that "Your Callsign" is a *required part of the exchange* as
> stated in  rule 4.3.  Its ommission makes the exchange invalid, IMO.  So
> it's redundant, that doesn't matter, it's *required*.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list