[CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update

[Guy Molinari]

Because it is publicly available and does not necessarily provide an advantage for just the owning op?
 
> From: sawyered at earthlink.net
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2010 15:17:53 -0500
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WW Update
> 
> It doesn't really matter to me since I never use them.contest or no contest,
> but what exactly is the difference between a personal skimmer located in
> Europe (for a W/VE contester) and a European Skimmer that displays all its
> info on the net. Aren't they both remote CW receivers that are showing
> callsigns and frequencies that can be read by the W/VE station? The CQ WW
> rules make it seem like one is way more advantageous than the other but I am
> failing to see why.
> 
> 
> 
> Ed N1UR
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest