[CQ-Contest] FW: Busted spots in ARRL CW

Zack Widup w9sz.zack at gmail.com
Thu Feb 24 13:41:15 PST 2011


Either that, or someone else was pirating his call.

That's one thing wrong with the "courtesy" feature of packet, which I
think was initially set up so if you wanted to give credit for the
spot to someone else, you could use his callsign for the spotter as a
courtesy. But it's been abused.

The "humorous" abuses such as posting spots from AP1RIL on April 1,
and GH0ST, GH0UL etc. on Halloween I can live with, even get a chuckle
from. The malicious stuff we can all can do without.

73, Zack W9SZ


On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Glenn Wyant <va3dx at sympatico.ca> wrote:
> VE7"KFM" and KF8O
> have had an on-going battle on 14275 for years
>
> They are both anti-contesting
>
> I would suspect that one of these folks was behind this.
>
> Glenn  va3dx
>
>> A check of the RAC database shows that VE7FKM is not an issued callsign.
>> My feeling is that whoever did this spotting did so maliciously.  Someone
>> much better equipped than me can trace the source.
>>
>> 73
>>
>> Al, VE1AL
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list