[CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
K1TTT at ARRL.NET
Wed Jan 12 07:02:39 PST 2011
No wonder there is so much angst over certain political pundits
pontificating, some people just don't get sarcasm and satire or a rhetorical
question when they hear it. I don't care that there aren't perennial
winners, I am just echoing the standard arguments that come up whenever rule
changes are mentioned just to get them all out in one shot. If I hadn't
said it someone else who did even less research than me would have!
David Robbins K1TTT
e-mail: mailto:k1ttt at arrl.net
AR-Cluster node: 145.69MHz or telnet://dxc.k1ttt.net
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steve London [mailto:n2icarrl at gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, January 12, 2011 14:40
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Suggestion for NAQP
> On 01/12/2011 07:05 AM, K1TTT wrote:
> > But, but, but, that would change the whole nature of the
> contest. that would
> > cause all the old records to be obsolete. that would change
> > That might force some people to turn their antennas a bit.
> That might
> > change the perennial winners a bit. that might make it
> more interesting.
> Perennial winners ?
> Look at the top-5 in the August CW NAQP, that was just
> published in the
> January/February NCJ. Compare that to the high-claimed scores
> in last weekends'
> NAQP. A very different list ! This is what makes the NAQP a
> great contest.
> Steve, N2IC
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest