[CQ-Contest] Opinion: SO-unassisted should not be using CW Skimmer

Jukka Klemola jpklemola at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 08:15:09 PST 2011


Aye.
I second Mark's view.

Amount of data equals a networked device, but only with stations that
are heard at the location.
Very powerful tool !

And, a fair-play based rule is the Skimmers should be networked.


73,
Jukka OH6LI



2011/11/30 Mark Bailey <kd4d at comcast.net>:
> Hi Tor:
>
> I, for one, don't agree - I see little difference between "local"
> skimmers and the worldwide network.  To the operator, they look the same
> during a contest.
>
> 73,
>
> Mark, KD4D
>
> On 11/29/2011 5:57 PM, RT Clay wrote:
>> It is also worth pointing out (again) that there is a BIG difference between allowing only "local" skimmers at one's own station, and allowing connection to a worldwide network of other people's skimmers. Some people only think of "skimmer" as the worldwide network- but so far no contest makes a distinction between the two cases.
>>
>> In the case of only a local skimmer there are still situations where a human op is better- for example skimmer is not very good at copying weak signals on the low bands.
>>
>> Tor
>> N4OGW


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list