[CQ-Contest] [N1MM] New RAC (ARRL contest) sections

[Radio K0HB]

Meant to say "I find NO particular reason to abandon those conventions."



On Aug 8, 2012, at 5:59 PM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb at gmail.com> wrote:

> SweepStakes has always used Sections for mults.
> 
> Other ARRL tests (ARRL-DX and NAQP come to mind) use states, provinces/territories.
> 
> RAC contests have never used sections that I can recall.
> 
> Your cause for concern eludes me, as I find particular reason to abandon those conventions.
> 
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> 
> 
> 
> On Aug 8, 2012, at 11:39 AM, Steve London <n2icarrl at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> So, let me get this straight....
>> 
>> RAC splits Ontario into 4 sections, but won't use those sections in RAC contests.
>> 
>> ARRL (which is independent from RAC) does use those new sections in ARRL contests.
>> 
>> Sorry, but I continue to believe that this is a poor decision by the ARRL. Maybe 
>> it should be reconsidered by the ARRL Board of Directors at their January meeting.
>> 
>> 73,
>> Steve, N2IC
>> 
>> On 08/08/2012 09:45 AM, Tom Haavisto wrote:
>>> No
>>> 
>>> They will only appear in contests that use ARRL sections.  RAC Canada Day
>>> and Winter contests use provinces as mults.
>>> 
>>> Tom - VE3CX
>>> 
>>> On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ted Edwards W3TB<w3tb.ted at gmail.com>wrote:
>>> 
>>>> **
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> May I also assume that these sections are also used in Canadian contests
>>>> such as the Canada Day events in December and July 1st?
>>>> 
>>>> I had anticipated -- incorrectly -- that they would appear at Field Day and
>>>> trained our new operators to watch for them.
>>>> 
>>>> --
>>>> 73 de Ted Edwards, W3TB and GØPWW
>>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest