[CQ-Contest] DC and NAQP

[Paul Stoetzer]

They are. As is UN Headquarters.

It's silly that a building in Manhattan is a multiplier but the District 
of Columbia is not. The fact is that the District of Columbia is the 
only separate top-level political subdivision within the United States 
or Canada that is not a multiplier in NAQP.

73,

Paul, N8HM

On 8/11/2012 10:16 AM, Aldewey at aol.com wrote:
> Correct me if I'm wrong but PR and VI ARE multipliers in NAQP.  Right?
> What am I missing?
>   
> 73,
>   
> Al, K0AD
>   
>   
> In a message dated 8/11/2012 8:36:34 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> wn3vaw at verizon.net writes:
>
> Otherwise, one could make a case for PR & VI, as populated US  territories
> within the generally accepted bounds of North America, should  also be
> mults.
> Is that what you want?  Or would that be an  unanticipated  consequence?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest