[CQ-Contest] your opinion pse

[Jorge Diez - CX6VM]

Hi Phillip

Wich contest are you talking about?

I don´t agree with that. I don´t like to participate in contest with this
kind of rule. And if not specify in the rules is worst

This is why I don´t participate in contests that assume that you are lying
and adding QSO´s in the log

73,
Jorge
CX6VM/CW5W

-----Mensaje original-----
De: cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com
[mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] En nombre de Phillip Conza
Enviado el: lunes, 25 de junio de 2012 01:48
Para: cq-contest at contesting.com
Asunto: [CQ-Contest] your opinion pse

 
Gentlemen,
                     Your opinions or ideas etc on this please.

A local contester had a contact removed because of :

.Last year an OP  worked a LU station but it was disallowed because he was
the only one who worked him, and 4 others had to work it before it was
allowed as a multiplier. Nothing in the rules about that - apparently it's
accepted international practice. 

I am not on a witch hunt I have read the rules covering this contest and I
have read the ARRL DX rules which I take qualify as a body who would use " 
accepted international practice " yet I can't find any reference to this
..Is there such or is this pie in the sky ?

Please gentleman your input.. or a pointer to this  " accepted international
practice "

Just don't want to see it happen again ..

73 Phillip
ZL2TZE / ZL2U
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest