[CQ-Contest] Extended Line Score - Hours Worked

[Joe]

How about a whole new catagory?

"2X2"

Multi op but only two person.
And the first 24 hrs use one call, then the second 24 hr half start all 
over with the second call?

Thoughts?

Joe WB9SB
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 4/1/2013 9:19 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
> By the way - this is not my original idea.  Others have suggested this 
> before, particularly Trey N5KO.  Given the wider availability of data 
> and tools, it may be an idea whose time has arrived.
>
> 73, Ward N0AX
>
> On 4/1/2013 8:02 PM, Ward Silver wrote:
>> By publishing the number of hours worked with the score, using 
>> whatever time-on calculation the log-checkers feel is appropriate for 
>> that contest, it would be straightforward for an interested 
>> third-party to calculate score/hr statistics.
>>
>> Public, validated logs could also be parsed for all sorts of 
>> time-related stats:
>> - best first 24 hour score
>> - best second 24 hour score
>> - best N hour score
>> - fastest to N points
>> and so on.  It would be the equivalent of baseball's sabermetrics - 
>> what is the analog of "slugging percentage"?
>>
>> If the data was there and someone cared about the calculation, it 
>> would probably be performed.  We might find an interesting way to 
>> compete that doesn't require a new formal category.  Or we might 
>> decide that what we already have is good enough and that more 
>> categories don't really change things.  Nevertheless, the impact on 
>> the contest sponsors, who have very limited resources, would be minimal.
>>
>> 73, Ward N0AX
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>