[CQ-Contest] In the light of the 2013 CQ WW DX CW Claimedscores.

[Roberto Rey]

I agree just saying "I want a new scoring system because scores are 
unexplainable and people cheat" is irresponsible.. If somebody has proof of 
cheatingyou need to just flat out say it . ... .it's very easy to smear 
people's reputation..but you need to talk the talk!

73 de HK3CW Rob
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Ron Notarius W3WN" <wn3vaw at verizon.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 1:59 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] In the light of the 2013 CQ WW DX CW 
Claimedscores.


> Oh?
>
> Which scores?  Why do you think they're unexplainable?
>
> A blanket assertion like this without details directly or indirectly 
> smears, or could smear, the reputations quite a few operators.
>
> While I can't speak for anyone else, I'd certainly want more information 
> about what is allegedly happening before even beginning to consider 
> revamps or changes, let alone agreeing to them.
>
> 73
>
>
> On 12/04/13, Martin , LU5DX wrote:
>
> I really hope at least some of you would agree that a revamp of the
> observer program is needed.
>
> There are scores that are really unexplainable.
>
> Hopefully cheaters will get disqualified (again).
>
> Vy 73.
>
> Martin, LU5DX
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest