[CQ-Contest] Rules off the table ?

[Jeff Steinman]

Agree, SS is a one of a kind contest with a rich history. No reason to change it, there are plenty of other contests for those that prefer a different format.
73
Jeff N5TJ

> From: W5OV at W5OV.COM
> To: ww4b73 at gmail.com; cq-contest at contesting.com
> Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2013 08:36:31 -0600
> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Rules off the table ?
> 
> Glenn,
> 
> No flames necessary. The problem here is not that your opinion doesn't
> matter. 
> 
> The problem is that there are many others who love SS as it is.
> 
> Changing it to be a contest where you work people more than once would
> change the contest forever, and many think not for the better. There are
> other contests that allow that, so you're not being deprived in any way. As
> N2IC said, if you want to operate that kind of a contest, there is the NAQP.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Bob W5OV
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
> Glenn Biggerstaff
> Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2013 6:05 AM
> To: cq-contest at contesting.com
> Subject: [CQ-Contest] Rules off the table ?
> 
> I am extremely upset by the whole idea that the rules are off the table .I
> was under the impression that we ( the members) told the league what we
> wanted to do not the other way around. However I was taught the same thing
> in high school about congress and that has turned out to be a rather naive
> idea. Why don't we start voting out league representatives who don't
> represent the members ?
>  I have my Nomex suit on so let the flames begin.
> 
> Glenn, ww4b at ww4b.net
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> 
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest