[CQ-Contest] SS Sundays

Sun Feb 10 17:51:26 EST 2013

I love this soooo much even if the ARRL should not adopt it, would there 
be some other group willing to manage it? So we could do it anyway?

Could you imagine, suddenly six hours from the end the band is all alive 
again!

joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 2/10/2013 1:07 PM, Joe wrote:
> Now That I LOVE!
>  The last 6 hours of the FULL SS make a SSS Sweep Stakes Sprint.
>
> Such a cool idea, especially for those that can no longer physically 
> do a single op 24 test. or those that physically could, but for some 
> reason or another whatever the reason is, they could invest 6 hours.  
> You do not know how much I love that idea!
>
> Joe WB9SBD
> Sig
> The Original Rolling Ball Clock
> Idle Tyme
> Idle-Tyme.com
> http://www.idle-tyme.com
> On 2/10/2013 9:43 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
>> No, but there *might* be a correlation if limited-time competition 
>> categories were offered, perhaps focused on Sunday operating 
>> periods.  A "6-hour Sunday" class might add some activity in the dead 
>> zone, particularly as the age of SS participants continues to rise.
>>
>> 73, Pete N4ZR
>> Check out the Reverse Beacon Network at
>> http://reversebeacon.net,
>> blog at reversebeacon.blogspot.com.
>> For spots, please go to your favorite
>> ARC V6 or VE7CC DX cluster node.
>>
>> On 2/9/2013 8:59 PM, W0MU Mike Fatchett wrote:
>>> We seemed to have gotten well off the original topic which was a 
>>> substantial drop in participation in the contest and what things we 
>>> could do to get more people to participate.
>>>
>>> Sunday afternoon, lack of rate was mentioned as reason that 
>>> discouraged some.
>>>
>>> I am not sure if there is any correlation between changing the 
>>> length of the contest  and increasing participation.
>>>
>>> Mike W0MU
>>>
>>> On 2/9/2013 9:14 AM, Zack Widup wrote:
>>>> If you don't want to operate during the full length of the contest,
>>>> what does it matter what the actual length of the contest is? If you
>>>> only want to operate on Saturday, then do just that, etc.
>>>>
>>>> If you are in it mostly for fun (like I usually am), then you operate
>>>> when you wish. If you want to be competitive, you'd do whatever it
>>>> takes to be competitive if that means operating the maximum time
>>>> allowed by the rules.
>>>>
>>>> 73, Zack W9SZ
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/8/13, Radio K0HB <kzerohb at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>> Not only NO but HELL NO!
>>>>>
>>>>> Bring more players, not less operating time.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Friday, February 8, 2013, Timothy Coker wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Shorten it... better for family time, less Sunday boredom, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think this idea has something for everyone. I know a lot of the 
>>>>>> older
>>>>>> guys who no longer choose to stay in the chair due to ailments. I 
>>>>>> know a
>>>>>> number of the younger guys who choose to not stay in the chair 
>>>>>> due to
>>>>>> family time. The third is the shear boredom factor of a one 
>>>>>> contact per
>>>>>> station rule.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I could go with the break period too... maybe two hours like NAQP? I
>>>>>> personally like the decision making involved with when to break. 
>>>>>> Plus we
>>>>>> can take a walk, sleep, eat dinner with our loved ones, etc.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim/ N6WIN.
>>>>>> On Feb 6, 2013 12:27 PM, "Steve London" <n2icarrl at gmail.com
>>>>>> <javascript:;>>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 02/06/2013 11:42 AM, RT Clay wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Yes, the fix is simple: shorten the overall length to 24 
>>>>>>> hours. Still
>>>>>>>> keep a required off time of 6 hours. > The off time is 
>>>>>>>> important to
>>>>>> allow
>>>>>>>> stations in different parts of the country to choose the best 
>>>>>>>> times to
>>>>>>>> operate (day/night). That is particularly important for small
>>>>>>>> stations.
>>>>>>>> Choosing when to take off is also > part of SS strategy.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I could almost warm up to this. Except I would say get rid of the
>>>>>> required
>>>>>>> off time. Go 24 hours if that's what you want.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   With 24 hours total the exact start time doesn't matter either 
>>>>>>> as far
>>>>>>> as
>>>>>>>> propagation- it covers a full day.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 0000Z to 2359Z . That should make Sunday more interesting - it 
>>>>>>> will be
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> first opportunity for significant high band propagation, and there
>>>>>>> would
>>>>>> be
>>>>>>> only one night-time opportunity.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   I'm sure the average qso speed in SS has gone up over the years-
>>>>>> computer
>>>>>>>> logging/etc, plus the exchange used to be longer. So it makes 
>>>>>>>> sense to
>>>>>> make
>>>>>>>> the whole thing shorter.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That is absolutely true. I have listened to recordings from the 
>>>>>>> 1970's.
>>>>>>> Much slower. That was the way to pick up the hoards of 
>>>>>>> newly-licensed
>>>>>>> General's who could barely do 13 WPM.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>   Yes, records get messed up. But they already get messed up 
>>>>>>> every time
>>>>>>> a
>>>>>>>> new section is added.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Agreed.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If SS is shortened, I could even warm up to grandfathering the old
>>>>>> records
>>>>>>> and starting new records.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 73,
>>>>>>> Steve, N2IC
>>>>>>> ______________________________**_________________
>>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com <javascript:;>
>>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>>>>> "Just a boy and his radio"
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
>>>>> Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>