[CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted
Rex Maner
k7qq at netzero.net
Wed Jan 30 14:39:00 EST 2013
Joe I don't know how somone would get caught , however If you were
checking a Log you might find a station is running on 14005 at a really good
rate then suddenly for one contact of 20 seconds makes a contact on 14065 of
a needed mult, an then is back on 14005 CQing 25/30 sec, later. Now I know
that some operate SO2R and are really good and could work this in but ???
If I find this many times in a log I'm gonna look at the log VERY, VERY
carefully.
Rex K7QQ
----- Original Message -----
From: "Joe" <nss at mwt.net>
To: <cq-contest at contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, January 30, 2013 3:35 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted
> On 1/29/2013 10:09 AM, Hal Kennedy wrote:
>
> The point I'd like to make is there are really three categories: - SO -
> SO (A) - SO (cheating A) We don't know too much about how the scores of
> the third category stack up, but knowing of a few stations that do it
> routinely, and who have been caught and penalized in some cases and STILL
> continue to do it,
>
> I have yet to operate Assisted. Hey I just recently started to use a
> computer to log. But i am curious, as to how does on that is claiming SO,
> but does SOA, how do they actually get caught?
>
> Joe WB9SBD
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> ____________________________________________________________
> Visa® Black Card™
> Earn 25,000 Bonus Points Plus Get Exclusive Rewards: Apply Now!
> http://thirdpartyoffers.netzero.net/TGL3265/51095aa164cff5a9b3c54mp01vuc
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list