[CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted

[Joe]

Plus my station you do not know what freq I was on (only if the other 
station says exact freq) because my old boat anchor rigs are not 
computer controlled so I say 20 meters CW and thats about all ya get.

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 1/30/2013 3:21 PM, RT Clay wrote:
>> From: Martin , LU5DX <lu5dx at lucg.com.ar>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Non-Assisted vs. Assisted
>> To: "Rex Maner" <k7qq at netzero.net>
>> Cc: "Joe" <nss at mwt.net>, cq-contest at contesting.com
>> Date: Wednesday, January 30, 2013, 2:20 PM
>> Be sure that is NOT how cheaters
>> proceed.
>> They turn on the cluster probably in a different PC via
>> remote desktop in
>> some distant country or QTH, even in their smart phones.
>> The still manually scan the band up and down following the
>> same pattern
>> unassisted ops follow.
> I am really not following this whole assisted/unassisted debate, but just have one small comment (for those who analyze frequencies in logs): Don't assume all unassisted ops follow a linear search pattern. When I operate S&P (unassisted) for example I pick out stations on a SDR panadapter most of the time rather than turning a knob. So the qso's I make may sometimes hop around the band and not be in any particular frequency order.
>
> Tor
> N4OGW
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>