[CQ-Contest] Error free RBN

[Joe]

I am curious,
Has there been and studies comparing the error rates between the RBN 
spots and "Human" made spots? There MUST be a human error rate out there 
too.  Who makes more errors?

Joe WB9SBD
Sig
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
Idle-Tyme.com
http://www.idle-tyme.com
On 7/19/2013 8:37 AM, Marijan Miletic, S56A wrote:
> Rick, ZL2HAM wrote: My Skimmer often hears stations only once that aren't
> heard by any other Skimmers.
>
>   
>
> We got several local CW Skimmers in small S5 but I preffer unfiltered richer
> RBN spots.  Poor summer condx and my temporary dipoles combined with FT1K
> barefoot do not generate a lot of spots when I call short run CQ.  However I
> was amazed that ZL2HAM heard me twice with few dB S/N.  This is significant
> contribution to our main goal of studying radio propagations based on RBN
> automatic reporting.  Keep it uncensored - Hi.
>
>   
>
> LP MMM S56A
>
>   
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>