[CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...

[N2TK, Tony]

I sure hope so, or I have been doing it wrong :-)

N2TK, Tony

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
W0MU
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 4:18 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...

Fun and contesting....do those terms still mix?   :)

On 6/6/2013 12:26 PM, Gerry Hull wrote:
> Agreed, Ed.  In the end, It doesn't matter one hill of beans..
>
> I'll ask the FD chairman -- but I'm simply a band captain trying to 
> figure out what I want to do.
> The club has been 4A for years -- they probably don't want to change now.
>
> Until this rule this year, it would not have been a no-brainer decision.
>
> So, we will either change categories or coordinate the number of 
> on-air TX's (as N4OGA suggested), or I'll just not configure it.
>
> It's still going to be a lot of fun -- as it always is.
>
> 73, Gerry W1VE
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Edward Sawyer
<SawyerEd at earthlink.net>wrote:
>
>> Gerry, Just call it a 5A and be done with it.  Then you can still 
>> demonstrate and you are not trying to "intentionally claim fewer 
>> transmitters".  After all.its not a contest.  What does it matter?
>>
>>
>>
>> Ed  N1UR
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest