[CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...
tony.kaz at verizon.net
Thu Jun 6 18:25:32 EDT 2013
I sure hope so, or I have been doing it wrong :-)
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Sent: Thursday, June 06, 2013 4:18 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] ARRL FD Rule 4 Opinion?...
Fun and contesting....do those terms still mix? :)
On 6/6/2013 12:26 PM, Gerry Hull wrote:
> Agreed, Ed. In the end, It doesn't matter one hill of beans..
> I'll ask the FD chairman -- but I'm simply a band captain trying to
> figure out what I want to do.
> The club has been 4A for years -- they probably don't want to change now.
> Until this rule this year, it would not have been a no-brainer decision.
> So, we will either change categories or coordinate the number of
> on-air TX's (as N4OGA suggested), or I'll just not configure it.
> It's still going to be a lot of fun -- as it always is.
> 73, Gerry W1VE
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Edward Sawyer
<SawyerEd at earthlink.net>wrote:
>> Gerry, Just call it a 5A and be done with it. Then you can still
>> demonstrate and you are not trying to "intentionally claim fewer
>> transmitters". After all.its not a contest. What does it matter?
>> Ed N1UR
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest