[CQ-Contest] KILLING THE GOLDEN GOOSE
Steve London
n2icarrl at gmail.com
Mon Mar 18 11:05:59 EDT 2013
Can we please stop with the conspiracy theories ? Can we stop
attributing motives to the survey author ?
73,
Steve, N2IC
On 03/17/2013 02:38 PM, Paul O'Kane wrote:
>> The survey is OPEN to all.
>
> It's not a survey! Yes, it looks like a survey, and
> I've responded to it myself but, in reality, it's not
> a survey.
>
> Rather, it appears to be, in part, a tool or a pretext
> for the purpose of giving the CQWW committee an option
> to abolish the SO category and wash its hands of the
> (admittedly) thankless task of determining which SO
> entries should be reclassified.
>
> Why else would the committee "survey" contesters in
> general about an issue that has no relevance to anyone
> but single-ops? After all, by definition, single-ops
> all want to stay SO, and the others couldn't care less
> - because it doesn't concern them.
>
> A "survey" to combine QRP, LP and HP, or another
> to combine SO and MO would make just as much, or
> as little, sense.
>
> The "survey" does offer the possibility, if SO and
> SOA categories (and results) were to be combined,
> of identifying those that claimed not to have used
> assistance. That is no solution or, rather, it's
> a solution to a problem that doesn't exist. SO
> entrants want to stay SO, quite apart from seeing
> a meaningless comparison of their scores with those
> from other entry categories.
>
>> Anyone who has an interest in the CQ WW DX Contest may take the survey.
>
> This statement raises two issues. What applies
> to CQWW DX applies equally to the remaining major
> contests that continue to distinguish between SO
> and SOA. Should a precedent be set by CQWW, it's
> a fair assumption it would soon apply to all the
> others.
>
> Secondly, it seems to me that anyone who does not
> already enter as SO in the major contests has no
> business responding to survey questions that do not
> concern them, or that will have no effect on their
> chosen way of operating.
>
> 73,
> Paul EI5DI
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> .
>
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list