[CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes

Radio K0HB kzerohb at gmail.com
Sat May 25 10:27:27 EDT 2013


Not so, Steve.

If I cobble up your call in SS, I simply lose that Q.  There is no
"encouragement penalty" beyond that.

73, Hans, K0HB

On Friday, May 24, 2013, Steve London wrote:

> On 05/24/2013 01:19 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
>
>> Kelly,
>>
>> The station which makes the "most clean Q's" should win.
>>
>> If I make 800 Q's with no errors and you make 805 Q's with 4 errors (same
>> mults), then you beat me 801 to 800.  Unless we played in a socially
>> engineered contest like CQWW.
>>
>
> This may disappoint you Hans, but virtually every major contest is
> "socially engineered" by your definition. Please take your politics to a
> more appropriate, non-ham-radio reflector.
>
> 73,
> Steve, N2IC
>
>  73, Hans, K0HB
>>
> ______________________________**_________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/**mailman/listinfo/cq-contest<http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>


-- 
73, de Hans, K0HB
"Just a boy and his radio"
--
Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com


More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list