[CQ-Contest] CQ WW Rules Changes

[Steve London]

Sorry Hans...that is incorrect. Look carefully at any of your recent SS 
Log Checking Reports (LCR).

Busted call = loss of QSO + 1 penalty QSO.
Not-in-log call = loss of QSO + 1 penalty QSO.
Busted exchange = loss of QSO.

73,
Steve, N2IC
QST/ARRL Web Phone Sweepstakes Author


On 05/25/2013 08:27 AM, Radio K0HB wrote:
> Not so, Steve.
>
> If I cobble up your call in SS, I simply lose that Q.  There is no
> "encouragement penalty" beyond that.
>
> 73, Hans, K0HB
>
> On Friday, May 24, 2013, Steve London wrote:
>
>     On 05/24/2013 01:19 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
>
>         Kelly,
>
>         The station which makes the "most clean Q's" should win.
>
>         If I make 800 Q's with no errors and you make 805 Q's with 4
>         errors (same
>         mults), then you beat me 801 to 800.  Unless we played in a socially
>         engineered contest like CQWW.
>
>
>     This may disappoint you Hans, but virtually every major contest is
>     "socially engineered" by your definition. Please take your politics
>     to a more appropriate, non-ham-radio reflector.
>
>     73,
>     Steve, N2IC
>
>         73, Hans, K0HB
>
>     _________________________________________________
>     CQ-Contest mailing list
>     CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>     http://lists.contesting.com/__mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>     <http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest>
>
>
>
> --
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
> "Just a boy and his radio"
> --
> Sea stories at --------> http://K0HB.wordpress.com
> Superstition trails ---> http://OldSlowHans.com
>
>
>