[CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?

[Joe]

Thats exactly why I was saying about the penalty of before and after qso's.

In the old days I think I remember it was called Callbooking. Where a 
missing mult was "Fabricated" or even more hidden were just QSO's even 
to padd the qso count.

Joe WB9SBD
On 11/27/2013 5:45 PM, Radio K0HB wrote:
> If you guess, it's a busted Q = No points.  With crutches like Super-Check-Partial loose in the wild, who needs to guess anyhow?
>
>
>
>
>
> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>
> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 3:54 PM, null <Cqtestk4xs at aol.com> wrote:
>
>> Without some sort of penalty why not guess and/or make up  "uniques".  Only
>> the Qs that they don't like are the ones you lose.  I  don't know if the
>> prior or subsequent QSO should be lost, but there needs to be  some kind of
>> penalty for busted Qs.  No penalty is so 2000s.
>>   
>> For the serious guys it DOES matter.
>>   
>> Bill K4XS
>>   
>>   
>> In a message dated 11/27/2013 5:01:28 P.M. Coordinated Universal Tim,
>> kzerohb at gmail.com writes:
>> Joe, I  think you're taking this game a little too seriously.
>> Screw up a QSO,  you lose that QSO, but punishment in the form of
>> additional
>> score  reduction is so 1940's.
>> 73, de Hans, K0HB
>> --
>> "Just a boy and his  radio"™
>> --
>>> I would like to see the QSO's before and  after also be  removed.
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest  mailing  list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing  list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>