[CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?

[Radio K0HB]

In the 1940's with paper logs, and no robot to cross-check them, I can see 
that could be a problem.

70 years later we now have computerized logs and extensive cross-comparison 
of logs by the robot.

Such tactics today would stand out like a sore (something) and be easily 
detectable as blatant cheating.  Don't punish it with losing a couple Q's. 
Issue a DQ.

Meanwhile quit draconian punishment of a simple logging error.  Take away 
the farkled Q.  Move along people, nothing left here to see.

73, de Hans, K0HB

-----Original Message----- 
From: Joe
Sent: Thursday, November 28, 2013 12:17 AM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Sending Call getting worse?

In the old days I think I remember it was called Callbooking. Where a
missing mult was "Fabricated" or even more hidden were just QSO's even
to padd the qso count.
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest