[CQ-Contest] Classic - Doing what was intended?
Edward Sawyer
SawyerEd at Earthlink.net
Fri Nov 29 10:23:53 EST 2013
Just to be clear, I have no objection to the Classic Category. I think that
categories that match competitive desires with like minded people are great.
During the commentary leading up to the category creation, there was lots of
discussion about this Category "creating" more activity as operators who
were demotivated to ever be competitive at 48 hours would be newly motivated
for a 24 hour competitive event. It would be interesting to see if that, in
fact, happened. The notables NOT operating as much are easy to see. The
others would not be easy to see.
Did anyone on the reflector actually operate 24 hours this year in either
mode but last year, or the last 2 years, operate 15 - 18 hours or less?
Inquiring minds want to know.
Ed N1UR
Personally, I have found a direct correlation to my physical condition at
ability to do well at 44 - 45 hours. I know others have too. Currently I
am running 7.5km - 8km - 3 times a week, and did very well with 45 hours.
We need MORE motivations to stay in good shape, not less, in my opinion. So
all those liking Classic - more power to you - be glad like I am that there
is a category that supports your interest.
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list