[CQ-Contest] Need clarification from DL1MGB

4O3A 4o3a at t-com.me
Tue Dec 16 16:03:07 EST 2014


Hello Chris,

This is clear now. Thank you very much.

So nobody who would like to qualify for WRTC will not operate unassisted 
in next two years, as it is senseless.

Chris, it will be very kind if you can  explain reasons why you decide 
to put unassisted and assisted in the same "basket"?

At the end, may I conclude that further discussion is senseless as you  
are not going to change existing rules? Maybe I am lonely? If do, not a 
big deal  :-)

73
Ranko

On 12/16/2014 8:39 PM, Christian Janssen DL1MGB wrote:
> Hi Ranko and others,
>
> regarding your calculations:
>
> The 14 points assisted gets 1000 points.
> The 10 points unassisted gets 714 points.
>
> Of course you are always free to discuss the qualification rules and 
> we are always open to any comment. But with the discussions we 
> followed on different mailing lists and the feedback we got from 
> several contesters, we came to the conclusion that there is no reason 
> to make changes to the already published rules (expcept the two typos 
> we already corrected).
>
> 73s Chris DL1MGB
> President WRTC2018 Organizing Committee
>
>
>
> Am 16.12.2014 15:30, schrieb 4O3A:
>> Hi Chris,
>>
>> would you be so kind to clafiry what exactly mean definition below:
>>
>> *Assisted scores are compared against Unassisted scores.
>>
>> If someone make in CQWW as unassisted - 10 points
>> Another guy make in same contest as assisted - 14 points
>>
>> What are final scores for WRTC qualification? Both 1000, of Assisted
>> with 14 points gets 1000, and unassisted guy will get 1000 x 10/14?
>>
>> I am also curious - Does it have any sense to still discuss some
>> qualification rules, or rules are final, and comments are useless?
>>
>> 73
>> Ranko
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>
>
> -----
> No virus found in this message.
> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
> Version: 2014.0.4794 / Virus Database: 4235/8748 - Release Date: 12/16/14
>
>



More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list