[CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

Joe nss at mwt.net
Sat Feb 1 08:53:06 EST 2014

Morning Hank,

How about the other direction? ALA: Farnsworth?  IE the letter speed is 
faster than the word speed. The letters are fast but spaced at a slower 
rate. makes fast code even easier to copy.

The Original Rolling Ball Clock
Idle Tyme
On 1/31/2014 9:00 PM, Hank Greeb wrote:
> Or, at least sending "real code" instead of compressed spaces between 
> elements of letters, shortening the duration of a "space" and other 
> LIDdish tricks which makes it difficult to read at any speed.
> I can copy 40+ wpm "real code" but quite often have trouble copying 
> the LIDS who intentionally play tricks with International Morse Code.
> 72/73 de n8xx Hg
> QRP >99.44% of the time
> On 1/31/2014 21:48,"Yuri" <ve3dz at rigexpert.net> wrote:
>> ------------------------------
>> Message: 4
>> Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 12:58:19 -0500
>> From: "Yuri"<ve3dz at rigexpert.net>
>> To:<cq-contest at contesting.com>
>> Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
>> Oh well...
>> Next step would be suggesting to slow down for those who can't copy 
>> CW well?
>> Yuri VE3DZ
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list