[CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules

[Jim N4KH]

I understand the thoughts here, but I personally would prefer this contest be kept as "pure" as possible and let operator skill and station performance play out in the results. A classic style contest if you will. We can all seek to improve in those two areas to some degree. I like running assisted in other contests but I like the simplicity and limited op time of the Naqp also. I would not start chopping up the results into assisted, unassisted, antenna setup etc., but would support expanding the breakdown into regional/section results and awards. 
There, my two cents worth...
Jim N4KH

Sent from Samsung tablet

-------- Original message --------
From David Gilbert <xdavid at cis-broadband.com> 
Date: 01/12/2014  8:06 PM  (GMT-06:00) 
To cq-contest at contesting.com 
Subject Re: [CQ-Contest] NAQP Rules 
 

  I don't see how any except suggestion #2 has the slightest relevancy 
to your complaint.

Dave   AB7E



On 1/12/2014 2:58 PM, Jeff Clarke wrote:
> Am I the only one who has a big letdown when I check the 3830 scores and see how badly I get beaten? I don’t know who figured out that someone like myself who is running wire antennas (or someone with wires/tribander beam) can be compared evenly to someone with a big station with multiple monoband beams on towers just because we are both running 100 watts. That’s silly. Those big stations would still probably beat me even if I ran a KW.  And it’s not because I’m a poor operator.
>
> Here are some ideas :
>
> 1) Have both a SO2R class and a classic category (one radio) like they have in CQWW .
> 2) Add a tribander/wires category
> 3) High and low power classes
> 4) Add an assisted category
> 5) Divide the US into regions and have top ten boxes for each of them. The way conditions were yesterday the west coast had even more of an advantage then they usually do because 15 and 10 meters were both open pretty good.
>
> Don’t take this email the wrong way (as complaining) because I love NAQP CW and the activity yesterday was great. It’s just a pretty stale contest because the same 3 or 4 stations win every year for a long as I can remember. Plus I would love to compete against someone who has a station more equal to mine.
>
> Jeff KU8E
>
> ---
> This email is free from viruses and malware because avast! Antivirus protection is active.
> http://www.avast.com
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest