[CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

[Peter Voelpel]

A qso containing only one call sign is imho not a complete qso.

73
Peter 


-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Yuriy Rakushchynets
Sent: Donnerstag, 30. Januar 2014 22:40
To: Tom Osborne; CQ-Contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened

Each operator us own style running CQ, and is bad idea to force to mandatory
ID after 3 qso. Whats will be next? no more than 2 QSO when you S&P
No more 200qso per hour? Common folks, don't want to wait for Mult, just
go away.

 
-Regards 
Yuri  N2TTA



On Thursday, January 30, 2014 2:45 PM, Tom Osborne <w7why at frontier.com>
wrote:
 
HI John

I think some of the software has a setting where it will automatically 
send a CQ after so many Q's are logged.  That would work to make it 
legal.  73
Tom W7WHY




> What is the penalty - disqualification?  While it is a poor practice to
> not regularly I.D., a person can easily make 3 QSOs in 15 seconds and in
> the heat of the moment it is possible to forget and make a 4th or even 5th
> QSO in less than 1/2 minute before remembering to send a callsign. I would
> not consider this scenario to be unsportsmanlike conduct.
>
> John KK9A - P40A
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest