[CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
john at kk9a.com
john at kk9a.com
Fri Jan 31 12:07:07 EST 2014
If you want to maximize your QSOs you should not be just listening to a
single radio waiting for a station to ID. Sprint is a completely
different contest which has a QSY rule. It is not reasonable to compare
the identification portion of the rules with the WPX contest.
John KK9A
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] CQ WPX rules, it finally happened
From: Doug Smith W9WI <dougw9wi at gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 31 Jan 2014 09:12:32 -0600
Some people try to COMPETE and WIN. That's why they try to maximize the
number of contacts (aka QSOs).
<snip>
Expecting the S&P operator to waste 30 seconds doing nothing waiting for
the run operator to ID is to suggest the S&P operator's time is not
valuable - that he is not entitled to COMPETE and WIN.
I note the Sprint contests have required ID with every QSO from the
beginning. At least here in the U.S. these contests are recognized as
*the* test of operator ability. Nobody is suggesting this rule be deleted.
IMHO its addition to the WPX is a welcome change.
==
Doug Smith W9WI
Pleasant View, TN EM66
_________________________
More information about the CQ-Contest
mailing list