[CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules

[Radio K0HB]

Hey, guys.  I got it!!!!  We can solve this easily.

Just outlaw S&P stations and the whole problem goes away.  Who needs 'em 
anyhow!


73, de Hans, K0HB
--
"Just a boy and his radio"™
--



-----Original Message----- 
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett
Sent: Tuesday, June 24, 2014 2:47 PM
To: cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Comments on CQWW Rules

The aim is gain two way contacts?    I thought it was to work as many
people as possible and as many mults.  Pileup control is done by giving
callsigns.  So in an effort to placate the I NEED IT NOW  society a
rules change has been made to remove a viable strategy from a run
station so that S&P stations can get a call or verify a call faster.

The next rule change we need is that everyone gets a shiny trophy and we
have no winners and losers..................


Mike W0MU

On 6/23/2014 10:25 PM, Christian Schneider wrote:
> AF6O wrote:
> >Once you try to force a competitor to adopt a strategy to boost his
> competitors score it ceases to be a contest.
>
> With the aim of the contest being to gain as much TWO-WAY-contacts, the 
> other half of a qso seems to be such an essential part(ner) of the action 
> that the decision does not seem to be unwise. Oh, and it is simply fair to 
> take care of that point. But YMMV
> Chris DL8MBS
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest