[CQ-Contest] WAE QTC tactics

[Saulius Zalnerauskas]

So why you work in contest if NO QTC?
Read rules before!
Points for You and for them - only one rule!

And dont use this stupid @TEST@ after CQ TEST CALL CALL (STOP here)

73, Sam LY5W

On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Gerry Hull <gerry at yccc.org> wrote:

> Agreed.  Many times I had callers Send QTC?   and no QTC available for
> them.
> In order to start the QTC, I need the callsign!
>
> Example:
>
> them: QTC?
> me: Yes (I have some QTCs)
> them: <callsign>
> Me: NIL (not for you, specifically.)
>
> Instead:
>
> them: QTC <callsign>?
> Me. NIL TEST W1VE
>
> Doesn't seem like much but it added up over the course of the contest!
>
> 73, Gerry W1VE
>
>
> On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 1:26 AM, Katsuhiro Kondou <kondou at voyackey.net>
> wrote:
>
> > In article <
> > CAGFPXLJFPPcpZ6k1X4O1AAYeFJ3kef_yP74OZN9GPBNyauscoQ at mail.gmail.com>,
> >         Mats Strandberg <sm6lrr at gmail.com> wrote,
> >         on "Wed, 12 Aug 2015 08:10:09 +0300";
> >
> > > QTC? without a call from us EU is nothing bad at all. We have full
> > control
> > > of which stations that still have available QTC, so what's the point to
> > > bother him or her with my call?
> >
> > For my situation, some stations asked me QTC several times even if shi/he
> > already had 10 QTCs from me.  So, I could not trust all stations
> completely
> > were aware of available QTC.
> >
> > The point is that it takes more time to know who she/he is.  If I could
> get
> > her/his call sign at the same time, I might have ignored her/him and
> picked
> > up another possible station instead.
> > --
> > Katsuhiro 'Don' Kondou, JH5GHM (JH1GBZ for contesting)
> > _______________________________________________
> > CQ-Contest mailing list
> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
> >
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>