[CQ-Contest] CR3L Should Reconsider Submission Catagory

[Rudy Bakalov]

Not really. Proportionality only makes sense if you are comparing identical stations- equipment, skills, teams, etc.  CR3L has demonstrated that you can do more with less. In the extreme example, a SOAB station can qualify as M/M.

The purpose of the categories is to set a maximum bar (e.g., single vs. many operators, low vs. high power, etc.), not minimum.

Rudy N2WQ

Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect.


> On Dec 8, 2015, at 5:17 AM, Jorge Diez CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> GM!
> 
> They thing is that they choose a category BECAUSE they saw other scores
> 
> If 3830 doesn't exist, what do you think, they will be M2 or MM?
> 
> If all have a PROPORTIONAL, if all is "normal", MM will do more points than M2 and M2 more points than MS, so if you did MS you will not send as M2 or MM, only if you see others scores and accommodate you category to win
> 
> And if this is Ok, well, we are very bad
> 
> 73,
> Jorge
> 
> 
> Enviado desde mi iPhone
> 
>> El 8 dic. 2015, a las 06:57, Rudy Bakalov <r_bakalov at yahoo.com> escribió:
>> 
>> The thing is, in both cases the ops would be following the rules as the categories overlap.
>> 
>> Rudy N2WQ
>> 
>> Sent using a tiny keyboard.  Please excuse brevity, typos, or inappropriate autocorrect.
>> 
>> 
>>> On Dec 7, 2015, at 9:58 PM, Jorge Diez CX6VM <cx6vm.jorge at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> 
>>> So if you agree with that because within the rules they can send as M2 or MM we are very bad
>>> 
>>> So V47T or CR3OO would change for SOAB HP ASSISTED to win the plaque and this is ok for you?
>>> 
>>> 73,
>>> Jorge
>>> CX6VM/CW5W