[CQ-Contest] Is working the QSO B4 good on long term for us ?

[Georgek5kg at aol.com]

John, I agree.  It is my practice to work dupes and not question  them.  
 
And, if I call someone and he gives me a QSO B4, I usually simply  ask for 
another QSO.  Most times, I get the QSO, but sometimes,  the op just wants 
to argue about it, ARRRG.  After all, I would  not have called him if I had 
known I had worked him before!
 
73, George
 
George  Wagner, K5KG
941-400-1960  

 
In a message dated 12/8/2015 5:49:33 A.M. Hawaiian Standard Time,  
john at kk9a.com writes:

That is  unsportsmanlike conduct. Lets say we work early in the contest and
I log  you incorrectly as VA2EA,  Later I call VA2EW and you won't work  me.
You get credit for the previous contact and I don't. It would have  been
just as easy to give me a report the second time. QSO B4 is not one of  my
macros.

John KK9A


To:     cq-contest at contesting.com
Subject:    [CQ-Contest] Is working the  QSO B4 good on long term for us ?
From:    VE2TZT  <ve2tzt at arrl.net>
Date:    Mon, 07 Dec 2015 20:27:56  -0500
List-post:     <cq-contest at contesting.com">mailto:cq-contest at contesting.com>


It  is after that bad experience that I have decided to systematically
refuse  the QSO's B4.

After all, if my callsign is busted in the other guy log,  I do not lose
the points but he lose the points and if he answers ''NO''  when I send QSO
B4 then I will work him without  discussion.

Interested by your opinion on that point.

Gilles  VA2EW

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest  mailing  list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest