[CQ-Contest] CQWW popularity from EUR Perspective: data
nss at mwt.net
Wed Dec 23 17:06:19 EST 2015
or to help level things out at least the ten districts, then it's really
close to Canada.
The Original Rolling Ball Clock
On 12/23/2015 3:09 PM, KB8N via CQ-Contest wrote:
> I had a two year assignment to Europe in the early 90s, where I held the
> call DA1AM. Let me tell you, the adrenalin rush from an almost
> inexhaustable number of multipliers on the low bands made the contest really
> incredible. Being that far north, you could sometimes get some Auroral effect going
> on and pick up the continental mults on teh higher bands as well. In any
> case, it provided a deep well of scoring opportunities throughout the 48
> hour period.
> I've always wondered why we didn't include states as multipliers when we
> allow Canadian provinces to be counted.
> Paul K5AF
> In a message dated 12/23/2015 1:37:41 P.M. Central Standard Time,
> jamesdavidcain at gmail.com writes:
>> >Remember, that there is an incentive for EU's to work each other on the
>> bands...to a much greater degree than for USA types to work each other
>> zone and done).
>>>> That's a PERFECT example of the problem with current contest scoring
>> >>73, Jim K9YC
>> Just imagine ... if the ARRL DX Contest counted U.S. states and Canadian
>> provinces as multipliers for U.S. and Canadian participants. Even if the
>> contacts counted only one point, or even zero points.
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
More information about the CQ-Contest