Ron Notarius W3WN
wn3vaw at verizon.net
Sun Feb 1 12:31:13 EST 2015
Let us not cast stones trying to assign blame to those who came before.
There's a new crew in charge. Wish them luck, and offer them support when
...and fortunately, my daughter is done with her acting classes as of last
night's performance (although the High School musical is coming up in 2
months), so maybe I can participate in the next Sprint...
73, ron w3wn
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 10:50 PM
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Where?
But no one was interested enough to "rattle the cages, raise the flags,
et. nausea" until it died, and was resurrected. I ask, why did the
contest community have to let it drop into the doldrums and die before
it was resurrected. And, there was a lot of finger pointing and blaming
the previous organizers before the current organizing group got together
and put together the new plan.
I trust that the "mob of 10" or whatever they call the current
organizing committee has enough foresight and organizing ability to
continue for the long haul, and not let it dribble off into the doldrums
72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP >99.44% of the time
On 1/31/2015 9:48 PM, Jack Brindle wrote:
> Hmmm. Doesn't sound dead to me. NA Sprint SSB is definitely alive at this
> - Jack B, W6FB
>> On Jan 31, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Hank Greeb <n8xx at arrl.org> wrote:
>> Where was all the support or the NA-Sprint when the contest community let
it get to <50 logs being submitted in the last contest?
>> If over 300 folks were interested in the contest, why did it die?
>> 72/73 de n8xx Hg
>> QRP >99.44% of the time
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
More information about the CQ-Contest