[CQ-Contest] Where?

Ron Notarius W3WN wn3vaw at verizon.net
Sun Feb 1 12:31:13 EST 2015

Let us not cast stones trying to assign blame to those who came before.

There's a new crew in charge.  Wish them luck, and offer them support when

...and fortunately, my daughter is done with her acting classes as of last
night's performance (although the High School musical is coming up in 2
months), so maybe I can participate in the next Sprint...

73, ron w3wn

-----Original Message-----
From: CQ-Contest [mailto:cq-contest-bounces at contesting.com] On Behalf Of
Hank Greeb
Sent: Saturday, January 31, 2015 10:50 PM
To: cq-contesting
Subject: Re: [CQ-Contest] Where?

Yeah, jack:

But no one was interested enough to "rattle the cages, raise the flags, 
et. nausea" until it died, and was resurrected.   I ask, why did the 
contest community have to let it drop into the doldrums and die before 
it was resurrected.  And, there was a lot of finger pointing and blaming 
the previous organizers before the current organizing group got together 
and put together the new plan.

I trust that the "mob of 10" or whatever they call the current 
organizing committee has enough foresight and organizing ability to 
continue for the long haul, and not let it dribble off into the doldrums 

72/73 de n8xx Hg
QRP >99.44% of the time

On 1/31/2015 9:48 PM, Jack Brindle wrote:
> Hmmm. Doesn't sound dead to me. NA Sprint SSB is definitely alive at this
> - Jack B, W6FB
>> On Jan 31, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Hank Greeb <n8xx at arrl.org> wrote:
>> Where was all the support or the NA-Sprint when the contest community let
it get to <50 logs being submitted in the last contest?
>> If over 300 folks were interested in the contest, why did it die?
>> 72/73 de n8xx Hg
>> QRP >99.44% of the time

CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest at contesting.com

This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list