[CQ-Contest] Rules for CQ WW DX Contest 2015

[Martin , LU5DX]

Hi Hans,
Actually it is all the opposite.
Contesting is only possible through the participation of casual entrants.
They are generous enough to get on the air give out points and send in
their logs.

On the other hand, there is a small fraction competing very seriously, and
we need additional rules to help adjudicate the logs properly.
Why would we put a burden on casual entrants or those not aiming for top
spots with additional rules?
Do you think that is beneficial?

In fact, the whole contest committee cares a about casual entrants very
much, even those sending in paper logs (For which the cc spends a
considerable amount of time converting them to the proper format so that
their scores can be cross-checked and published in the results).

And beyond that, I personally believe that those casual entrants deserve to
participate in a very serious event, where all possible measures are taken
to make it fair to everyone, regardless they are casual participants or top
spots nuts.

73,

Martin LU5DX

On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 11:16 PM, Radio K0HB <kzerohb at gmail.com> wrote:

> Well, there you have it a Jack.
>
> If you don't score up there with the big dogs like LU5DX, just stay on the
> porch and shut up.
>
> You're just casual.  Not really a part of the game, so it doesn't matter.
>
> Dit Dit,
>
> De HB
>
> —
> Sent from Mailbox <https://www.dropbox.com/mailbox>
>
>
> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Martin , LU5DX <lu5dx at lucg.com.ar> wrote:
>
>> Hi Jack,
>> The rule is not intended for casual entrants.
>>
>> http://cqww.com/searchbycall.htm?cl=k3fiv&submit=Go
>>
>> Vy 73,
>>
>> Martin LU5DX
>>
>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2015 at 3:01 PM, Jack Haverty <k3fiv at arrl.net> wrote:
>>
>> > On 06/06/2015 06:52 AM, Randy Thompson K5ZD wrote:
>> > > The final rules for the CQ WW DX Contest 2015 have been announced.
>> > > http://cqww.com/blog/rules-announced-for-cq-ww-contest-2015/
>> > >
>> >
>> > Cool! I just studied the new rules and the inclusion of the "recording"
>> > aspect gave me an idea for solving one of my long-term contesting
>> > problems - I often just can't type fast and accurately. My score is
>> > limited by my typing skills.
>> >
>> > Now I can just record the entire contest and simply use that recording
>> > as my log. No more need to type at all, just make sure everything
>> > needed is in the recording/log.
>> >
>> > Of course, I'll have to spend some time to convert my log after the
>> > contest ends into the proper Cabrillo format as required for
>> submission.
>> > But I can do that without the pressure of contest frenzy, as long as I
>> > make the deadline. I bet my recording software can even slow down that
>> > fast CW to make it easier for me to convert it accurately into
>> Cabrillo.
>> > My typing skills no longer matter.
>> >
>> > I'll probably still use my traditional logging program to assist me in
>> > avoiding dupes when I'm S&Ping. But running -- just let the recorder
>> > capture it all. Should improve rates quite a bit.
>> >
>> > Hmmm. Perhaps this is not what the rules intended? Well, they require
>> > me to record the contest, and don't say anything about my log other
>> than
>> > I have to submit it in Cabrillo standard format. So, why not?
>> >
>> > I promise not to use the recording to modify my log. How can I? The
>> > recording *is* my log. I just have to convert it into Cabrillo format.
>> >
>> > I can even be Unassisted.
>> >
>> > Removing tongue from cheek...
>> > /Jack de K3FIV
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > CQ-Contest mailing list
>> > CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>> >
>> _______________________________________________
>> CQ-Contest mailing list
>> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>>
>
>