[CQ-Contest] Posting Scores

David Siddall hhamwv at gmail.com
Sun Mar 22 09:21:44 EDT 2015

It's great that the capabilities to which Rick refers exist and are used by those who wish.   It's not so great to attempt to bully others to "do it only my way".   The RUDX already is uninteresting to a segment of contesters because of its over-regulatory and under-inclusive structure.  

73, Dave K3ZJ

> On Mar 21, 2015, at 9:14 PM, Rick Dougherty NQ4I <nq4i at contesting.com> wrote:
> I cannot believe what I have been seeing and hearing this RDXC!! Hundreds
> of stateside signals and not hardly a one posting a score...I feel very
> strongly that if you USE the technology to have packet, or skimmer
> assistance, then you should post your score! The UA hams have done a really
> wonderful job in their website..it keeps getting better and better...
> My hat is off to the following: W8CAR, AA3B, K3IT, W3LL, W6AWW, N3MX, K3ZU,
> N3BNA, and W1KM for posting their scores for all to see! What a go
> gentlemen!
> So, How about it guys....post, or don't use packet and skimmer!
> NQ4I
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

More information about the CQ-Contest mailing list