[CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting

[RT Clay]

>On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 8:37 AM, Joe <nss at mwt.net> wrote:
 >
>
>Vlad how about a signal SSB so processed it's barely understandable?
Obviously you give them more than "5" on the "readability" rating to indicate they "turned the processing knob to 11"
59 = perfect audio69 = slight over-processing, some syllables lost
99 = loud but unintelligible

TorN4OGW