[CQ-Contest] [Bulk] Re: Q-Signals for Contesting

[Zack Widup]

Actually, I would think that the "Readability" number would go less than 5
if you couldn't "read" them. Maybe a "39" or a "29" for a signal report.

73, Zack W9SZ


On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 9:43 AM, RT Clay <rt_clay at bellsouth.net> wrote:

> >On Wednesday, May 13, 2015 8:37 AM, Joe <nss at mwt.net> wrote:
>  >
> >
> >Vlad how about a signal SSB so processed it's barely understandable?
> Obviously you give them more than "5" on the "readability" rating to
> indicate they "turned the processing knob to 11"
> 59 = perfect audio69 = slight over-processing, some syllables lost
> 99 = loud but unintelligible
>
> TorN4OGW
>
> _______________________________________________
> CQ-Contest mailing list
> CQ-Contest at contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest
>